icesilikon.blogg.se - Cubase 9 pro how to change buffer size

#Cubase 9 pro how to change buffer size driver
#Cubase 9 pro how to change buffer size windows

Is there something else going on here? I had kind of figured given a (relatively speaking) slightly higher tier interface (I realize $660 USD is basically just off of the floor in terms of price of interfaces but still), I would be able to manage 96k/24 without any problems, but maybe I was wrong.

So is trying to record at 96k/24 unrealistic for someone with consumer grade equipment? What do you out there who dont work in pro-studios record in?

Im not making a Hollywood feature film here, nor do I think anyone is going to want super hires DSD files of my music or anything, but I would like a nice, high quality audio file.

What determines what the "audio performance" gauge in Cubase is measuring? Is it the audio interface? Is it the CPU? Both?.

My computer shouldnt cause me any issues, its a Ryzen 1700x 4Ghz on all 8 cores and 32 GB ram. Some of which I know are a little heavy handed like some of the Waves and Fabfilter Pro stuff. I will say, this song does have about 25 tracks in it, most of which are VSTi's and most have a fair bit of effects processing on them. I'm aware I'm asking much more of the interface and or CPU, as well as why, but I have other questions. I realized I hadnt touched my buffer size, but it was already maxed out at 1024, and obviously, decreasing it made that problem worse. I notice that the "audio performance" meter, is now getting much too high for my liking, and indeed, Im getting some crackles and pops and the occasional stutter on playback. So I thought to myself, well lets amp that up to 96k/24. I was making this last song at 44.1k/16 because of my previous interface.

Or I could anyway.īut here is where I get confused. And I am happy to say I can jam a bunch of effects onto a track and still monitor real time with zero problems. I just recently got a new interface, a Focusrite Clarett 4pre, for a lot of reasons, but one was latency. I tested this some years ago on my old system (with onboard FW controller), but USB perfomed better.So I understand what sample rate, bit depth and buffer size are, though Im still not an expert.

Last possible solution would be to connect the UCX via FW, using a PCIe>FW controller card. I just ordered a PCIe USB controller card, with a different USB chipset (Renesas). I really tried everything, EVERY USB Port on the mobo (even the pure USB 2 ones), different Cubase versions, instaling & running Cubase as admin & safe start mode. I was sure it is AMD (or ASMEDIA USB chipset related).Īs I said, no problems at all with my old Intel PC. I have the newest Cubase version but it also happened on older ones. The playback then sounds totally bitcrushed.

#Cubase 9 pro how to change buffer size windows

And when it stops working I usually also can't play any other Windows audio anymore (like Spotify or Youtube.). It's interesting that sometimes the buffer size change works and sometimes not. I was running the exact same stuff (Cubase & UCX) before with an older Intel 3930K system, If this is the case, I will go have to go back to Intel, which sucks, because the ryzen is great otherwise. In my case I think it is somehow related to the AMD based setup. The problem occured from the start, I also tried with an older Windows buildĪlso, every USB Port available on the mobo behaves the same.

#Cubase 9 pro how to change buffer size driver

RME Driver version: 1.168, Hardware Revision: 48ĪSUS PRIME X470 PRO (latest AGESA 1.0.0.4 BIOS), Ryzen 3900xĮvery possible driver, windows and firmware is up to date. No reaction to buffer size changes in Cubase, no matter if I change from cubase itself with the settings dialog,Īlso if I change the buffer size after I close Cubase, Cubase won't playback any audio, I have to restart the system.Ĭubase 10.5, Cubase 10, Cubase 9.5 (all latest versions) I have the exact same problem with my FF UCX (USB connnected).